Semifinals Evaluation
| Element | Objective | Scoring Weight | 
| A.- Project Plan Technical Review | 
 | 65% | 
| 1. Innovation | Creativity and Originality | 15% | 
| 2.- Market Feasibility | Response to Clear Market Needs | 15% | 
| 3.- Management Feasibility | Human and Technical Resources | 15% | 
| 4.- Financial Feasibility | Start up and Sustainability | 15% | 
| 5.- Overall Business Plan Presentation | Technical / Presentation Professionalism | 5% | 
| 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| B.- Promotion tools and Prototype | 
 | 35% | 
| 1.- Graphical presentation OR video | 
 | 10% | 
| 2.- Facebook group/page or Blog | 
 | 10% | 
| 3.- Prototype | 
 | 15% | 
| Total Percent | 
 | 100% | 
Evaluation Scale: 1-5 
Project Plans will be evaluated on the following criteria with points assigned on this rating scale: 
| 0 = Does not meet the criteria at all or attempt to – Unacceptable. | 
| 1 = Meets some criteria but unacceptable – Very poor. | 
| 2 = Meets the criteria minimally – Poor. | 
| 3 = Meets the criteria but does not exceed it – Adequate. | 
| 4 = Meets criteria and substantially exceeds it – Good. | 
| 5 = Meets criteria and demonstrates highest excellence and superiority – Excellent. | 
A. Business Plan Technical Review
Maximum 65 points – Maximum 5 points each section 
| 1.- Innovation | 
| • The product/service responds to the challenge proposed | 
| • Demonstrates improvement in the Business process | 
| • The business idea demonstrates improvements by introducing something new/different | 
| Subtotal Innovation – Maximum points = 15 | 
| 
 | 
| 2.- Market Feasibility | 
| • Demonstrates the market for the company’s product/service | 
| • Understands the market and identifies the customers | 
| • States that the product/service will be competitive to achieve a leadership position in its market | 
| Subtotal Market Feasibility – Maximum points = 15 | 
| 
 | 
| 3.- Management Feasibility | 
| • Integrates the resources with its development strategies | 
| • Clearly defines the organizational structure | 
| • Combines technology with the production process | 
| Subtotal Management Feasibility – Maximum points = 15 | 
| 
 | 
| 4.- Financial Feasibility | 
| • States its funding strategy | 
| • Justifies the return of investment | 
| • Analyzes its cost structure/financial and investment forecast | 
| Subtotal Financial Feasibility – Maximum points = 15 | 
| 5.- Overall Business Presentation | 
| • Visual materials to present the project (video, photos, graphs, website, etc.) | 
| • Presents all requirements in a clear and complete form | 
| Subtotal Overall Business Presentation – Maximum points = 55 | 
| 
 | 
B Video, Website and Prototype
Maximum 35 points – Maximum 5 points each section 
| Description | 
| 1. Promotional Video | 
| • How effectively does the promotional video present the product / service benefits responding to the challenge proposed? | 
| • How well does the promotional video incorporate the corporate image of the business? | 
| Subtotal– Promotion Maximum points = 10 | 
| 
 | 
| 2. Website or online presence | 
| • How effective does the website inform about the product/service? | 
| • How creatively does the website outreach the target audience? | 
| Subtotal Website or online presence = 10 | 
| 
 | 
| 3. Prototype | 
| • The prototype demonstrates the product/services features/characteristics and responds to the challenge proposed | 
| • How well does the Team present a credible and / or functioning prototype? | 
| • How well does the prototype demonstrate innovative design / functionality? | 
| Subtotal Prototype – Maximum points = 15 | 
Evaluation for the Finals
| Element | Objective | Scoring weights | 
| Team Presentation | 
 | 
 | 
| 1.- Business Project | Feasibility/ Overall Quality | 25% | 
| 2.- Presentation | Professionalism / Teamwork | 15% | 
| 3.- Promotional video | Originality / Creativity | 10% | 
| 4.- Prototype | Functional / Realistic | 15% | 
| 5.- Elevator Speech | Compelling / “Short and Sweet” | 5% | 
| Total Percent | 
 | 100% | 
Evaluation Scale: 1-5: 
Project Plans will be evaluated on the following criteria with points assigned on this rating scale: 
| 0 = Does not meet the criteria at all or attempt to – Unacceptable. | 
| 1 = Meets some criteria but unacceptable – Very poor. | 
| 2 = Meets the criteria minimally – Poor. | 
| 3 = Meets the criteria but does not exceed it – Adequate. | 
| 4 = Meets criteria and substantially exceeds it – Good. | 
| 5 = Meets criteria and demonstrates highest excellence and superiority – Excellent. | 
A. Project Plan Final Presentation (Maximum 70 points)
| 1.- Business Project ‐ Maximum points = 25, i.e. 5 points each | 
| How feasible is the business idea in real market conditions? | 
| How well does the overall business plan present the idea and its elements? | 
| How well does the idea respond to the challenge? | 
| How clear is the scalability strategy? | 
| How well is the risk management/mitigation explained? | 
| 
 | 
| 2.- Presentation– Maximum points = 15, i.e. 5 points each | 
| How effectively and compellingly does the team present the project? | 
| How well does the presentation demonstrate personal teamwork and cooperation? | 
| How clear is the verbal presentation of the business idea and activities? | 
| 
 | 
| 3.- Promotional video – Maximum points = 10, i.e. 5 points each | 
| How effective does the promotional video sell the product / service | 
| How well does the promotional video present an image of quality for the business | 
| 
 | 
| 4.- Prototype – Maximum points = 15, i.e. 5 points each | 
| The prototype demonstrates the product/services features/characteristics. | 
| How well does the Team present a credible and / or functioning prototype? | 
| How well does the prototype demonstrate innovative design / functionality? | 
| Overall Prototype evaluation | 
| 
 | 
| 5.- Elevator Speech – Maximum points = 5 points total | 
| How well does the Elevator Speech summarizes the business idea | 
B. Financial and Investment Feasibility (Maximum 30 points, i.e. 10 points each)
| Demonstrates efficiency in its financial structure and forecast | 
| Demonstrates an investment opportunity for the industry to support the development of the solution, project, or idea | 
| Explains well the Return of Investment opportunity | 
Comments:
The judges as well can include a brief description of their observations and analysis.
 
								